Seagate and some Toshiba drives tended to be more prone to premature failures.Īlso check out Backblaze’s blog post which includes cumulative data as to hard drive failure rates as far back as 2014. Based on this data either HGST, or Hitachi would be a solid choice when it comes to preserving your data. We saw similar results for Q2 of last year. Overall, Seagate was probably the worst offender when it comes to failed HDDs over other brands such as Western Digital or Hitachi. Backblaze, a provider of cloud storage and backup services, has. The report includes a lot of data that is definitely worth a read. WD makes the most reliable hard drives and Seagate breaks the most Backblaze stats for 2022. This review looks at the quarterly and lifetime. Of that number, there were 1,866 boot drives and 97,770 data drives. With such a large sample size in such a controlled environment these stats are overall quite accurate with how drives are performing based on each manufacturer. Backblaze Failure rates since April 2013 As usual, Backblaze provided a quarterly update of the HDDs in its active arsenal. As of SeptemBackblaze had 99,636 spinning hard drives. Backblaze is one of the largest online cloud backup storage solutions with tens of thousands of hard drives currently in use so you can bet they go through a lot of drives. As of December 31, 2022, we had 235,608 drives under management. Other useful statistics such as service and uptime are also included in the report. One standout in the table above is the 12TB Seagate ST12000NM0007, which saw 2,023 failures, occuring when each drive was, on average, 1 year and 6 months old. In the market for a new hard drive and concerned about reliability? Every quarter Backblaze publishes its hard drive failure rate statistics to the public categorized by manufacturer and drive size.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |